прочитать первоисточник можно найти
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8f92/b8f92410ebb23529ba239e63a2b484b47efe8127" alt="комика "зелебобу" сравнили с диктаторами.. комика "зелебобу" сравнили с диктаторами.."
Not long ago, Volodymyr Zelensky was a comedian in Ukraine. He made his living playing a fictional president on television. Then, by a twist of fate, he became the real thing. And before he had time to adjust to the role, history threw him onto the world’s stage, catapulting him from a middling entertainer into an international symbol of resistance.
Overnight, the media transformed him into the embodiment of courage, the Churchill of Kyiv, the man who refused to flee, the warrior standing against tyranny. But what if this narrative is entirely false? What if Zelensky, rather than being the hero in this story, is actually the man who won’t allow the war to end — not for the good of his people, but because peace would mean his own downfall?
A good leader prioritizes the survival of his nation. He knows when to fight, and more importantly, he knows when to negotiate. Zelensky, however, has made it clear that his power depends on war, and war alone.
Авто-репост. Читать в блоге >>>